In the first part of our trauma-informed series, we defined the term and discussed best practices for working with students in trauma. For many educators, after we read the research supporting trauma-informed practices, we are quickly convinced that we need to act. The data strongly supports intervening early for students and with a therapeutic approach (instead of a punitive one).
Teachers who have taught students who have experienced toxic stress know how challenging it can be. I know after some of my experiences from the past five years, I said to myself, “There must be a better way.” A trauma-informed response is that better way. But how do we know who to target? Where do we start? And what do we do?
One question that typically comes up early in the process when talking about being “trauma informed” is, “How do I know which kids have had trauma and which haven’t—especially when I don’t know the students at the start of the year?” I think the best response to this that I have heard is to treat them all like they have experienced trauma. This shows a deep understanding of what trauma informed really means. Most of the best practices are universal best practices and are not necessarily based on which kids have had “the most” or “the least” amount of trauma. Being a trauma-responsive teacher doesn’t require sorting all the kids on the first day by the “trauma” they have had. Students respond differently to their past experiences, so it isn’t critical to know the ACE score for each student.
The practices for being trauma responsive are really universal, best practices for students. If we see trauma responsive strategies as “coddling, enabling, or soft,” we don’t really understand what trauma informed means. By being trauma responsive, we are using best practices and putting the student—not the adult—at the center of the behavioral situation. This takes a mindset shift; moving away from a classroom where we motivate through consequences and rewards toward a classroom that supports student well-being to make healthy and beneficial choices.
If a teacher believes there can be a better way to work with student behavior, what is that better way? Here are some examples of what it can look like in a classroom:
We have covered just the tip of the iceberg with trauma-responsive practices. There are many great tools available for teachers to help meet the needs of all of our students, especially those who need a new approach to their behavior. Missed the first part of this series? Check it out here. And for more teaching tips all year long, be sure to subscribe to the Educator blog.